1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 845 F.Supp.
  5. 845 F.Supp. 160 (1994)
 

VESTAR, INC. v. LIPOSOME TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Civ. A. No. 93-34-RRM.

845 F.Supp. 160 (1994)

VESTAR, INC., Plaintiff, v. LIPOSOME TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Sutton, Edmond J. Johnson, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, Conrad R. Solum, Jr., William E. Thomson, Jr., Carol A. Schneider, Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles, CA, and Adam Cochran, Vestar, Inc., San Dimas, CA, for plaintiff.

R. Franklin Balotti, Robert W. Whetzel, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, Lynn H. Pasahow, Beth H. Parker, Gil M. Soffer, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, CA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge

In this patent case, Vestar, Inc. seeks a declaratory judgment that United States Patent No. 5,180,713 is invalid, unenforceable and not infringed by Vestar. The declaratory defendant, Liposome Technology Inc., owns the '713 patent, which claims "a method of administering liposomes containing amphotericin B and having, after a storage period, a selected liposome size distribution in a size range of 0.5 microns...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases