1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 842 F.Supp.
  5. 842 F.Supp. 158 (1994)
 

MITCHELL v. STURM, RUGER & CO., INC.

Civ. A. No. 92-5098.

842 F.Supp. 158 (1994)

Helen M. MITCHELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen T. Saltz, Daniels, Saltz, Mongeluzzi & Barrett, Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

Joan A. Yue, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

Defendant has moved to compel the production of documents. For the reasons set forth below, I will grant in part and deny in part defendant's motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This products liability action arose from the shooting death of Leonard R. Mitchell, Jr. Subsequent to his death, Helen M. Mitchell filed the present complaint as executrix of Mr. Mitchell's estate, as well as on her own behalf as decedent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases