1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 815 F.Supp.
  5. 815 F.Supp. 184 (1993)
 

THOMAS v. AMOCO OIL CO.

Civ. A. No. 88-0328.

815 F.Supp. 184 (1993)

Arthur THOMAS v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette Division.

March 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore Michael Haik, Jr., Leon J. Minvielle, III, Haik & Minvielle, New Iberia, LA, Anthony D. Moroux, Domengeaux, Wright, et al, Lafayette, LA, for Arthur Thomas.

James E. Williams, Edmund E. Woodley, Woodley, Williams, et al, Lake Charles, LA, for Amoco Pipeline Co.

Anthony D. Moroux, pro se.

Marvin H. Olinde, Borrello & Giardina, Baton Rouge, LA, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Earl G. Pitre, Pitre, Halley & Sikich, Lake Charles, LA, for Woodson Const. Co. Inc.

RULING

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

Before us is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and, in the Alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by third party defendant Woodson Construction Company (Woodson). Woodson has also filed a Motion for a More Definite Statement and a Motion to Strike.

Plaintiff Arthur Thomas (not a party here) was employed by Woodson Construction Company. Amoco Pipeline Company (Amoco) hired Woodson to perform services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases