1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 620 N.E.2d
  5. 620 N.E.2d 368 (1993)
 

IN RE ROSIN

No. 74615.

620 N.E.2d 368 (1993)

156 Ill.2d 202

189 Ill.Dec. 400

In re Joseph ROSIN, Attorney, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Rehearing Denied October 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome Larkin and Jonathan P. Siner, Chicago, for the Administrator of the Atty. Registration and Disciplinary Com'n.

Russell J. Hoover, Jenner & Block, Chicago, for respondent, and Joseph A. Rosin, respondent pro se.

Justice BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court:

This disciplinary action against respondent, Joseph Rosin, began with a two-count complaint charging that he had commingled and converted client funds, and that he also commingled and converted the interest earned on those funds. The Hearing Board found that respondent had commingled but not converted client funds; however, it did not make any findings and conclusions regarding the interest earned on those funds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases