1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 31 (1993)
 

STATE v. NOGGLE

No. 92-412.

67 Ohio St.3d 31 (1993)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. NOGGLE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lowell S. Petersen, Ottawa County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark E. Mulligan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Gordon A. Senerius, for appellee.

PFEIFER, J.

What Dale Noggle is accused of doing is wrong in the eyes of his profession and in the eyes of society. What Dale Noggle is accused of doing, however, is not considered a criminal wrong by the state of Ohio. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

Consensual sexual conduct between persons over sixteen years of age, as was apparently the situation in this case, is generally legal in Ohio. The intent of R.C. 2907.03 is to forbid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases