1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 826 F.Supp.
  5. 826 F.Supp. 112 (1993)
 

MOBIL OIL v. ADVANCED ENV. RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES

Civ. A. No. 92-351-JJF.

826 F.Supp. 112 (1993)

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Crompton, Jr. of Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, Richard E. Kurtz, and Albert T. Keyack, of Woodcock Washburn Kurtz Mackiewicz & Norris, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Douglas E. Whitney, Matthew B. Lehr, and R. Judson Scaggs, Jr. of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, for defendant.

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff, Mobil Oil Corporation's ("Mobil") Motion to Compel Discovery. (D.I. 58). Specifically, Mobil seeks to compel Advanced Environmental Technologies, Inc. ("AERT") to comply with discovery requests on the issues of breach of a confidential relationship and patent invalidity. For the reasons outlined below, the Court will grant Mobil's Motion to Compel Discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases