WITKIN, ET AL. S.C. v. McMAHON

No. 92-2295-FT.

173 Wis.2d 763 (1993)

WITKIN, WEIBY, MAKI, DURST & LEDIN, S.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William McMAHON and Barbara McMahon, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 12, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendants-appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of Arthur De Bardeleben of De Bardeleben & Associates and Daniel Snyder of Park Falls.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs of Terri L. Lehre of Witkin, Weiby, Maki, Durst & Ledin, S.C. of Superior.

Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Wedemeyer, JJ.


MYSE, J.

William and Barbara McMahon appeal a judgment in favor of Witkin, Weiby, Maki, Durst & Ledin, S.C. (Witkin) for legal expenses incurred as a result of the Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations' claim demanding a refund of unemployment compensation benefits previously paid.1 The McMahons contend that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to limit counsel's recovery to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases