1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 25 (1993)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CORDOVA

No. 92-2192.

67 Ohio St.3d 25 (1993)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CORDOVA.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Karen B. Hull, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, we differ with the board's recommendation. We order instead that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., dissent.

WRIGHT, J., dissenting. I would follow the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases