1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 507 U.S.
  5. 507 U.S. 410 (1993)
 

CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC.

No. 91-1200.

507 U.S. 410 (1993)

113 S.Ct. 1505

123 L.Ed.2d 99

CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 24, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Yurick argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Fay D. Dupuis.

Marc D. Mezibov argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Martha K. Landesberg.*

Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., joined. Blackmun, J., filed a concurring opinion, p. 431. Rehnquist, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which White and Thomas, JJ., joined, p. 438.

Justice Stevens, delivered the opinion of the Court.

Motivated by its interest in the safety and attractive appearance of its streets and sidewalks, the city of Cincinnati has refused to allow respondents to distribute their commercial publications through freestanding newsracks located on public property. The question presented is whether this refusal is consistent with the First Amendment.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases