1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 836 F.Supp.
  5. 836 F.Supp. 79 (1993)
 

U.S. v. MONOCCHI

No. 3:92-CR-41 (JAC).

836 F.Supp. 79 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America v. Edward MONOCCHI and Robert Sicignano.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

November 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alex V. Hernandez, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, CT, for Government.

Richard A. Reeve, Asst. Federal Public Defender, New Haven, CT, for defendant Edward Monocchi.

Timothy P. Pothin, New Haven, CT, for defendant Robert Sicignano.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCING PROVISIONS

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:

The question presented is whether the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)1 may apply to a conspiracy charge when no single substantive distribution with which the defendants have been charged involves 500...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases