1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 825 F.Supp.
  5. 825 F.Supp. 58 (1993)
 

BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB v. DANBURY PHARMACAL

No. 92 Civ. 6838 (JSM).

825 F.Supp. 58 (1993)

BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and Mead Johnson & Company, Plaintiffs, v. DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian M. Poissant, John J. Normile, Pennie & Edmonds and Constance S. Huttner, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Alfred Enbelberg, Greenwich, CT, Kenneth P. George, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

MARTIN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company and Mead Johnson & Company are suing defendant Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. for patent infringement. Plaintiffs allege that defendant infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,182,763 (the "'763 patent") when defendant filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application which asserted that the '763 patent was invalid and unenforceable. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases