1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 837 F.Supp.
  5. 837 F.Supp. 34 (1993)
 

LAJOIE v. CONNECTICUT STATE BD. OF LABOR RELATIONS

No. 2:92-CV-1035 (JAC).

837 F.Supp. 34 (1993)

Robert J. LAJOIE and Peter D. Mattor v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS, Edwin S. Mak, Albert J. Rioux, Henry F. Healey, Jr., Thomas G. Martin, Clifford B. Green, Andrew C. Ocif, George R. Zeeb, Ted R. Satkowski, Frank Lucca, William A. Tremont, Roger Delsin, Connecticut State Sheriffs Association, County Sheriffs Advisory Board, Ronald F. Petronella, Margaret A. Lareau, Lowell P. Weicker, Joseph H. Harper, Jr., Jay Levin, and all other Special Deputy Sheriffs as parties having a direct interest in the outcome of the declaratory judgment.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret J. Slez, Slez & Slez, Westport, CT, for plaintiffs.

E. Stephen Briggs, Connecticut State Bd. of Labor Relations, Wethersfield, CT, for defendants Connecticut State Bd. of Labor Relations and Margaret A. Lareau.

Stephen J. O'Neill and Michael J. Lanoue, Office of the Atty. Gen., Hartford, CT, for defendants Mak, Rioux, Healey, Martin, Green, Ocif, Zeeb, Satkowski, Lucca, Tremont, Delsin, Connecticut State Sheriffs Ass'n, and County Sheriffs Advisory Bd.

Thomas P. Clifford, Office of the Atty. Gen., Hartford, CT, for defendant Petronella.

Henry S. Cohn, Office of the Atty. Gen., Hartford, CT, for defendants Weicker and Harper.

Louis B. Blumenfeld, Cooney, Scully & Dowling, Hartford, CT, for defendant Levin.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:

This action arises out of a Connecticut statute, Public Act 92-61, which prevents special deputy sheriffs from forming a labor union to represent them in collective bargaining with the State of Connecticut. The plaintiffs contend that Public Act 92-61 is unconstitutional, and they seek an injunction restraining the defendants from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases