1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 828 F.Supp.
  5. 828 F.Supp. 37 (1993)
 

OCÉ-OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. 92 C 2221.

828 F.Supp. 37 (1993)

OCÉ-OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC., and Océ-Nederland B.V., Plaintiffs, v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

July 16, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William O. Bittman, Pierson, Ball & Dowd, Washington, DC, Jeffrey Singer, Paul E. Wojcicki, Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Bernard L. Sweeney, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, Falls Church, VA, for plaintiffs.

Thomas F. Gardner, Suzanne S. Greene, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, IL, for defendant.

ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

This declaratory judgment action concerns alleged patent infringement and the procedural jockeying caused by the initial filing of a declaratory judgment action and, subsequently, an infringement action in another district. Plaintiffs Océ-Office Systems, Inc. and Océ-Nederland B.V. (collectively "Océ") filed this action on April 1, 1992 seeking a declaration that Eastman Kodak Co.'s ("Kodak") Letter Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases