1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 812 F.Supp.
  5. 812 F.Supp. 41 (1993)
 

WALUS v. PFIZER, INC.

Civ. No. 92-3407 (CSF).

812 F.Supp. 41 (1993)

Robert WALUS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 22, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley, Gazi & Jorgensen, P.A. by William H. Gazi, Iselin, NJ, for plaintiffs.

Porzio, Bromberg & Newman by Lauren E. Handler, Morristown, NJ, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler by David Klingsberg, Maris Veidemanis, New York City, for defendants, Pfizer, Inc. and Shiley, Inc.

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.

Before the court is a motion brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by defendants, Pfizer, Inc. ("Pfizer") and Shiley, Inc. ("Shiley"), for an order granting summary judgment in their favor on plaintiffs' complaint. The court has considered the parties' written submissions and oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, defendants' motion is granted.

Facts

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases