1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 159 B.R.
  5. 159 B.R. 681 (1993)
 

NEUMAN v. GOLDBERG

No. 93 Civ. 2092 (RWS).

159 B.R. 681 (1993)

Clayton NEUMAN, Andy Briant, and Alan Kadat, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Arthur G. GOLDBERG, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beigel & Sandler, Ltd., New York City (Herbert Beigel, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, P.C., New York City (Robert H. Pees, Stephen M. Baldini, Steven M. Pesner, of counsel), Camhy Karlinsky & Stein, New York City (Mark H. Budoff, Kenneth A. Lapatine, of counsel), Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn, New York City (James Janowitz, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Clayton Neuman, Andy Briant, and Alan Kadat, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, members of a putative class, (the "Plaintiffs") have moved to remand this action against Arthur Goldberg et al (the "Defendants") to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

The Parties

The Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases