POPE, Chief Judge.
Defendant Arthur Nathaniel Kendrick appeals from his conviction for robbery.
1. Defendant first argues there was not sufficient evidence for a rational finder of fact to find him guilty of robbery beyond a reasonable
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.