CARLETON v. TORTOSA

Docket No. C013153.

14 Cal.App.4th 745 (1993)

17 Cal. Rptr.2d 734

ERNEST CARLETON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MARY TORTOSA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

DeRonde & DeRonde and John A. DeRonde, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney and Mark E. Ellis for Defendant and Respondent.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

SCOTLAND, J.

This case presents the question whether a real estate broker had a duty to advise her client that the client's real estate transactions could have adverse tax consequences.

Plaintiff Ernest Carleton, an experienced real estate investor, employed defendant Mary Tortosa, a real estate broker, in the sale of two residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases