1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 3 (1993)
 

HARTT v. MUNOBE

No. 91-2025.

67 Ohio St.3d 3 (1993)

HARTT, APPELLANT, v. MUNOBE ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Becker, J. Stephen Teetor and Timothy E. Miller, for appellant.

James W. Rickman, for appellees.

MOYER, C.J.

This case presents several issues, of which the central is whether a referee may preside over a jury trial. If the answer is yes, we must decide whether, in this case, all parties consented to the presence of the referee in conformity to Civ.R. 53(A).

I

The relevant portions of Civ.R. 53 as in effect at the time of trial1 state:

"(A) Appointment. The court may appoint one or more referees, who shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases