1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 605 (1993)
 

STATE EX REL. STERNE v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 93-1778.

67 Ohio St.3d 605 (1993)

THE STATE EX REL. STERNE v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Opinion announced November 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff and Donald J. Mooney, Jr.; Strauss & Troy and Eric H. Kearney, for relator.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, Philip L. Zorn, Jr. and James W. Harper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondents.

Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Kim K. Burke and Mark G. Kobasuk, urging denial of the writ for amicus curiae, Hamilton County Conservative Forum.

Per Curiam.

On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597, 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.

Writ allowed.

A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases