1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 597 (1993)
 

STATE EX REL. MIRLISENA v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 93-1435.

67 Ohio St.3d 597 (1993)

THE STATE EX REL. MIRLISENA v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 14, 1993.

Rehearing granted and writ allowed October 7, 1993.

Opinion announced November 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beckman, Weil, Shepardson & Fatter and Peter L. Cassady, for relator.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, Philip L. Zorn, Jr. and James W. Harper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondent.

Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Kim K. Burke and Mark G. Kobasuk, urging denial of the writ for amicus curiae, Hamilton County Conservative Forum.

Per Curiam.

At an election held in the city of Cincinnati on November 5, 1991, electors voted to approve Issues 4 and 5 as amendments to the Cincinnati City Charter. These issues appeared on the ballot in the following form:

Issue 4

"Shall the proposed amendment to the Charter of the City of Cincinnati to provide that the people shall have the right to nominate, vote for and elect any citizen who is registered to vote in the city to be a member...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases