1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 587 (1993)
 

ESPARRA v. MAHONING CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 93-1986.

67 Ohio St.3d 587 (1993)

ESPARRA, APPELLANT, v. MAHONING COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 22, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin S. Hume Co., L.P.A., and Martin S. Hume, for appellant Porfirio Esparra, Jr.

James A. Philomena, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sharon K. Hackett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Mahoning County Board of Elections, Don Hanni, Jr., Mary Kathryn Smith, Dennis Vitt, and Mark Munroe.

This cause, here on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of In re Protest Filed by Citizens for the Merit Selection of Judges, Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 102, 551 N.E.2d 150, paragraph one of the syllabus. State ex rel. Bass v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections (1952),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases