STATE v. ARMSTRONG

Nos. 1 CA-CR 90-869, 1 CA-CR 90-870 and 1 CA-CR 91-171-PR.

176 Ariz. 470 (1993)

862 P.2d 230

STATE of Arizona, Appellee/Respondent, v. Loil Minor ARMSTRONG, Appellant/Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied November 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, and Crane McClennen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Atty. by Arthur Hazelton, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for respondent.

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by James M. Likos, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellant.

Loil Minor Armstrong, in pro. per.


OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The major issue presented by these consolidated appeals and petition for review of a denial of post-conviction relief is whether defendant's statements regarding prior bad acts (crimes) are admissible, absent independent proof that the prior bad acts were committed. We hold that they are admissible.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdicts, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases