1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 531 (1993)
 

CITYWIDE COALITION FOR UTIL. REFORM v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 92-2078.

67 Ohio St.3d 531 (1993)

CITYWIDE COALITION FOR UTILITY REFORM, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 3, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati, Jennifer L. Branch and Frank J. Wassermann, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, James B. Gainer; Duane W. Luckey, Thomas W. McNamee and Kaye Pfister Willi, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

James J. Mayer and Michael A. Gribler; Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Alan P. Buchmann, Arthur E. Korkosz and Lisa R. Battaglia for intervening appellee, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company.

Per Curiam.

CCUR argues that a non-cost-based declining block rate structure does not promote energy conservation and must be eliminated under the

[67 Ohio St.3d 533]
Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, Section 2601 et seq., Title 16, U.S.Code ("PURPA") and R.C. 4905.70.3

CCUR's reliance on the declining block standard proposed by PURPA is clearly misplaced. The commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases