MARRACINO v. BRANDSTETTER

Docket No. A056699.

14 Cal.App.4th 543 (1993)

17 Cal. Rptr.2d 700

WILLIAM G. MARRACINO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ZACHARY BRANDSTETTER, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

March 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Zachary Brandstetter, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

John W. Larson and Steven H. Larrabee for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

WERDEGAR, J.

On appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a trial de novo, defendant Zachary Brandstetter contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to enter judgment on a judicial arbitration award. We disagree. Accordingly, we shall affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs William G. and Vivian D. Marracino sued defendant for breach of contract, fraud...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases