1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 134 N.J.
  5. 134 N.J. 393 (1993)
 

STATE v. STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASS'N.

134 N.J. 393 (1993)

634 A.2d 478

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 20, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary L. Cupo-Cruz, Senior Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Alexander P. Waugh, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Michael J. Rappa argued the cause for respondent State Troopers Fraternal Association (Loccke & Correia, attorneys).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for Public Employment Relations Commission.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the so-called "discipline amendment" to N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3, L. 1982, c. 103, obligates the New Jersey Division of State Police (State Police or Division) to engage in collective negotiations concerning procedures, including binding arbitration, to review disciplinary determinations affecting state troopers.

A somewhat different issue precipitated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases