1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 175 Ariz.
  5. 175 Ariz. 343 (1993)
 

STATE v. SANDOVAL

No. 1 CA-CR 92-1302.

175 Ariz. 343 (1993)

857 P.2d 395

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Refugio SANDOVAL, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

July 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Atty. by Kevin Maricle, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for appellant.

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by Helene Abrams, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellee.

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

In this appeal by the state, we decide whether Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. ("A.R.S.") section 13-1402, which prohibits "indecent exposure," requires an act of a sexual nature in order for public nudity to constitute a violation of this statute. We hold that there is no such requirement and reverse the dismissal of the charges against appellee Refugio Sandoval ("defendant").

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases