1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 176 Ariz.
  5. 176 Ariz. 340 (1993)
 

HAZINE v. MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR CO.

No. CV-92-0295-PR.

176 Ariz. 340 (1993)

861 P.2d 625

Marcel HAZINE and Margueritte Hazine, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR COMPANY, a Delaware Company, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

October 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Friedman & Associates, P.C. by Steven M. Friedman and Goldman & Kaplan, Ltd. by David D. White, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears by Ralph E. Hunsaker, Lisa M. Sommer, Christopher Robbins, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.

Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. by W. Charles Thomson III, Phoenix, for amicus curiae Arizona Ass'n of Defense Counsel.

The Langerman Law Offices by Amy G. Langerman, Phoenix, and Haralson, Kinerk & Morey, P.C. by Dale Haralson, Carter Morey, Tucson, for amicus curiae Arizona Trial Lawyers Ass'n.

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

FACTS

Plaintiff Marcel Hazine was injured while working on an escalator manufactured and installed by defendant Montgomery Elevator Company (Montgomery). Hazine and his wife sued Montgomery in strict liability and in negligence. On the strict liability claim, they argue that the escalator was manufactured and installed in a defective condition that rendered it unreasonably dangerous.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases