1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 263 N.J.
  5. 263 N.J. Super. 237 (1993)
 

MORRIS v. MORRIS

263 N.J. Super. 237 (1993)

622 A.2d 909

MAUREEN MORRIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J. ROY MORRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 26, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Mackevich argued the cause for appellant (Mackevich & Burke, attorneys; Mr. Mackevich, on the brief).

Rita K. Nadler argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, attorneys; Ms. Nadler and Christine Ranieri Smith on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, SKILLMAN, VILLANUEVA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendant husband appeals from an order denying reduction of his alimony payments. The parties were divorced on June 27, 1991. Both parties were represented by counsel at the hearing. The children are grown and thus child support is not in issue. Their Property Settlement Agreement, dated the same date as the divorce, was attached to and incorporated into the judgment. The judgment states that the trial judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases