1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 132 N.J.
  5. 132 N.J. 330 (1993)
 

MANCINI v. EDS ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION

132 N.J. 330 (1993)

625 A.2d 484

MARY JANE MANCINI AND ANTHONY MANCINI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. EDS ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 14, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacy L. Moore, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).

Richard S. Hyland argued the cause for respondent (Morgan, Bor & Bornstein and Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, attorneys; Fredric L. Bor, on the letter brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, Justice.

This appeal involves a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Mary Jane Mancini and her husband, Anthony Mancini, against defendant, Electronic Data Systems Corporation (EDS), a servicing carrier of the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association, commonly known as the Joint Underwriting Association or JUA. The Law Division denied EDS's motion to vacate the default judgment and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases