1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 174 Wis.2d
  5. 174 Wis.2d 286 (1993)
 

BRAATZ v. LIRC

No. 91-1891.

174 Wis.2d 286 (1993)

496 N.W.2d 597

Theodore R. BRAATZ, Joanne Helen Wright, Susan E. Flemmen, Roxanne Lambert and Saundra O. Kortesma, Petitioners-Respondents, v. LABOR & INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 16, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by Bruce A. Olsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the petitioners-respondents there was a brief by Timothy E. Hawks and Shneidman, Myers, Dowling & Blumfield, Milwaukee and oral argument by Mr. Hawks.

Amicus curiae brief was filed by Chris Galinat and Melissa A. Cherney, Madison for the Wisconsin Education Association Council.

STEINMETZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Labor and Industry Review Commission ("LIRC") properly concluded that the marital status provisions of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act ("WFEA") permit the school district of Maple's health insurance nonduplication policy. The circuit court answered in the negative, and LIRC appealed from the judgment. The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court's judgment in Braatz v. LIRC, 168 Wis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases