1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 176 Ariz.
  5. 176 Ariz. 273 (1993)
 

STATE v. PULS

Nos. 2 CA-CR 91-0522, 2 CA-CR 92-0749-PR.

176 Ariz. 273 (1993)

860 P.2d 1326

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee/Respondent, v. Larry Erving PULS, Appellant/Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Reconsideration Denied and Redesignated as Opinion July 27, 1993.

Review Denied November 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie and Eric J. Olsson, Tucson, for appellee/respondent.

Harold L. Higgins, Jr., Tucson, for appellant/petitioner.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of one count of unlawful transfer of a narcotic drug and sentenced to a mitigated term of 5.25 years' imprisonment. On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict and in instructing the jury. He also claims that the evidence does not support his conviction. In his petition for post-conviction relief under Ariz.R.Crim.P. 32, 17 A.R.S., he asked for a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases