1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 177 Ariz.
  5. 177 Ariz. 206 (1993)
 

STATE v. VANNOY

No. 1 CA-CR 91-0351.

177 Ariz. 206 (1993)

866 P.2d 874

177 Ariz. 206

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. David Allen VANNOY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Denied February 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Div. and Randall M. Howe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

David Burnell Smith, Scottsdale, for appellant.

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

In this case, we decide whether the state must provide a breath sample to a defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol when the defendant has given a deficient sample in the breath test, but the state still uses the test results at trial. Defendant David Allen Vannoy was convicted following a jury trial of one count of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, a class 5 felony. He appeals from his conviction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases