1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 236 (1993)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KING

No. 93-867.

67 Ohio St.3d 236 (1993)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KING.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

James Draper, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Barry King, is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases