STATE v. BORST

No. 92-2439-CR.

181 Wis.2d 118 (1993)

510 N.W.2d 739

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Johnathon C. BORST, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark D. Lawton of Mark D. Lawton, S.C. of Portage.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, with Mary v. Bowman, assistant attorney general.

Before Gartzke, P.J., Dykman and Sundby, JJ.


GARTZKE, P.J.

Johnathon Borst appeals from the three amended judgments of conviction we describe in this opinion. He challenges the restitution provisions in the judgments. He asserts (1) that the trial court erred in holding that because restitution was overlooked when Borst was originally sentenced, restitution was a new factor that justified amending the sentence to include restitution and (2) that the amendments requiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases