1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 177 Ariz.
  5. 177 Ariz. 66 (1993)
 

HEINIG v. HUDMAN

No. 1 CA-CV 90-207.

177 Ariz. 66 (1993)

865 P.2d 110

Sandra K. HEINIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee, v. George HUDMAN and Cheryl Fisher Hudman, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied January 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dioguardi, Poli & Ball, Ltd. by Michael N. Poli and N. Mark Kramoltz, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant, cross appellee.

Treon, Strick, Lucia & Aguirre, P.A. by Gerald J. Strick and Scott F. Frerichs, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee, cross appellant George Hudman.

Goldstein, Kingsley & McGroder, Ltd. by Philip T. Goldstein and Pamela L. Kingsley, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee, cross appellant Cheryl Fisher Hudman.

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

Plaintiff Sandra K. Heinig appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants George Hudman and Cheryl Fisher Hudman. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

The parties raise numerous issues which we summarize as follows:

1. Does the doctrine of res judicata bar Heinig's action? 2. Does Heinig have a fraudulent conveyance claim against the Hudmans' marital community when she is a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases