1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 836 F.Supp.
  5. 836 F.Supp. 1552 (1993)
 

WILLIAMS v. MEAD COATED BD., INC.

Civ. A. No. 92-D-7-E.

836 F.Supp. 1552 (1993)

Michael L. WILLIAMS, Wonder B. Henry, Jr., and Carey Ford, Plaintiffs, v. MEAD COATED BOARD, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, E.D.

October 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Eugene Atchison, Julian L. McPhillips, Jr., Montgomery, AL, for plaintiffs.

Sue Ann Willis, J. Frederic Ingram, Birmingham, AL, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DE MENT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Michael L. Williams, Wonder B. Henry, Jr., and Carey Ford, brought this action against Mead Coated Board, Inc., pursuant to the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiffs asserted claims under both the disparate impact theory and the disparate treatment theory.

The trial of this action began...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases