1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 147 (1993)
 

MORROW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. PUC

No. 92-2380.

67 Ohio St.3d 147 (1993)

MORROW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 18, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heath & Associates and L. Kathleen Porter, for appellants.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, James B. Gainer and Steven T. Nourse, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Frost & Jacobs and Mark H. Longenecker, Jr., for intervening appellee, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company.

Per Curiam.

As their first proposition of law, appellants argue that the commission's denial of flat-rate EAS between the Morrow and Cincinnati exchanges is against the manifest weight of the evidence. In the alternative, they argue that the commission erred by not ordering United to retain Econo-Call service upon the implementation of measured-rate EAS. For the reasons which follow, we reject appellants' arguments and affirm the commission's order.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases