1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 815 F.Supp.
  5. 815 F.Supp. 1325 (1993)
 

U.S. v. PHAM

No. CR-92-0308 WHO.

815 F.Supp. 1325 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America v. Hung Khac PHAM.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 22, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Mendez, U.S. Atty., Elizabeth K. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff.

Arthur K. Wachtel, Horngrad & Wachtel, San Francisco, CA, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

Defendant Hung Khac Pham ("Pham") moves to suppress statements he made to government investigators on June 20 and June 22, 1992. Pham claims that those statements were obtained in violation of Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. § 3501, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Pham's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases