FARRIS v. ITT CANNON, A DIV. OF ITT CORP.

Civ. A. No. 92-B-1448.

834 F.Supp. 1260 (1993)

Gary L. FARRIS and Pamela K. Farris, Plaintiffs, v. ITT CANNON, A DIVISION OF ITT CORPORATION, A Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

October 12, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tim Correll, Waltz, D'Antuono, Correll & Anderson, Denver, CO, for plaintiffs.

E. Lee Dale, Andrew W. Volin, Sherman & Howard, Denver, CO, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendant ITT CANNON (ITT) moves for summary judgment contending there are no genuine disputes of material fact and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The issues are adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid their resolution. For all the reasons below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

This diversity action arises out of an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases