1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 1237 (1993)
 

TUCKER v. RANDALL

No. 88 C 7366.

840 F.Supp. 1237 (1993)

Billy B. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. Richard A. RANDALL and Albert Speenburgh, in their individual capacities and in their official capacities as officers of the Sheriff's Department of Kendall County, Illinois, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Graham and C. John Koch, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

James R. Schirott, Patrick K. Bond, Mary E. Dickson, Schirott & Luetkehans, and Charles E. Hervas and James Gus Sotos, Hervas Sotos & Condon, Itasca, IL, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MAROVICH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Billy B. Tucker ("Tucker"), a former detainee at Kendall County jail, brought a four-count complaint pursuant to Section 1983 and Illinois common law against Defendants Richard A. Randall ("Randall") and Albert Speenburgh ("Speenburgh"), officers of the Sheriff's Department of Kendall County, alleging inadequate medical care (Count I), inadequate access to a telephone and illegal taping...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases