1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 820 F.Supp.
  5. 820 F.Supp. 1212 (1993)
 

IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. C 87-1686 BAC.

820 F.Supp. 1212 (1993)

IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon B. Spivack, Coudert Brothers, James A. Hennefer, Law Offices of James A. Hennefer, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs.

Donn P. Pickett, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, CA, Jonathan W. Romeyn, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, for defendant.

ORDER

CAULFIELD, District Judge.

Defendant Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak") brings a motion to disqualify plaintiffs' counsel, the Coudert Brothers Law Firm ("Coudert"). Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, Kodak's motion to disqualify the Coudert firm is GRANTED.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

The Coudert firm has provided legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases