HENDGEN v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

92-038; CA A78110.

849 P.2d 1135 (1993)

119 Or. App. 55

Hans HENDGEN and Shauna Hendgen, Petitioners, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 31, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Shonkwiler, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Gloria Gardiner, Asst. County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

In Hendgen v. Clackamas County, 115 Or.App. 117, 836 P.2d 1369 (1992), we reversed and remanded LUBA's decision affirming Clackamas County's denial, inter alia, of petitioners' request for a determination that they had a nonconforming use in an exclusive farm use zone. In our earlier opinion, we disagreed with the tests that LUBA applied in determining whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases