1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 866 F.Supp.
  5. 866 F.Supp. 981 (1993)
 

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. v. ACTON

Civ. No. 3:92-CV-624-H.

866 F.Supp. 981 (1993)

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its corporate capacity, Plaintiff, v. Charles D. ACTON, David Clayton, William F. Courtney, Richard L. Davidson, and John R. Rittenberry, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

July 6, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack M. Englert, Jr., Anthony L. Joseph, denise S. Maes, Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Robert L. Schell, Virginia Adair Nelson Hammerle, Hammerle & Couch, Denton, TX, David L. Finney, Resolution Trust Corp., Legal Div., Dallas, TX, for Resolution Trust Corp.

William A. Roberts, Law Office of William A. Roberts, Paul Edward Coggins, Patricia Marie King, Meadows Owens Collier Reed Cousins & Blau, Brian Carl Jobe, Wimer & Jobe, Cheryl B. Wattley, Law Office of Cheryl Wattley, Linda Jean Barbour, Law Offices of Linda J. Barbour, Dallas, TX, for Charles D. Acton.

Edward P. Perrin, Jr., Hubert Adair Crouch, III, James C. Carlson, Crouch & Hallett, Dallas, TX, for David Clayton, Richard L. Davidson.

Gary Dale Elliston, Eric Duane Wewers, DeHay & Elliston, Dallas, TX, for William F. Courtney.

James E. Lobert, Rohne Hoodenpyle Lobert & Myers, Arlington, TX, for John R. Rittenberry.

John R. Rittenberry, pro se.

Maxel (Bud) Silverberg, pro se.

Maureen Powers, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Finance Div., Austin, TX, for Dan Morales.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SANDERS, Chief Judge.

On January 4, 1993, the RTC filed a Motion to Strike certain of the Defendants' affirmative defenses. Defendants Clayton and Davidson filed a joint response on January 25, 1993, Courtney responded separately on that day, and Acton responded on February 1, 1993. Defendant Rittenberry did not respond.

The Court concluded that the issues posed were more properly decided under a summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases