1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 858 P.2d
  5. 858 P.2d 886 (1993)
 

WEYERHAEUSER CO. v. PITZER

WCB 91-04855, 91-06246; CA A74818.

858 P.2d 886 (1993)

123 Or. App. 1

In the Matter of the Compensation of David A. Pitzer, Claimant. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. David A. PITZER, Reedsport Auto, Inc., and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 1, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Pitcher, Springfield, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Karen Werner, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent David A. Pitzer. With her on the brief was Stebbins & Coffey, North Bend.

Michael O. Whitty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents Reedsport Auto, Inc., and SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that set aside its denial of claimant's claim. We affirm.

In 1985, claimant filed a claim for a back strain while working for employer. The referee concluded that claimant's work with employer over a period of years had resulted in a degenerative condition and that that condition, together with specific work activity, had resulted in a compensable condition. Employer did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases