1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 832 F.Supp.
  5. 832 F.Supp. 903 (1993)
 

HOMRIGHAUSEN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP.

Civ. A. No. 92-2601.

832 F.Supp. 903 (1993)

Sarah HOMRIGHAUSEN, a minor by her parents and natural guardians, David and Lindsley HOMRIGHAUSEN, and David and Lindsley Homrighausen, in their own right v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION a/k/a Amtrak.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Binder, Raynes, McCarty, Binder, Ross & Mundy, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

Richard L. Goerwitz, Jr., Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUTTON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, the plaintiff's Answer and the defendant's Reply. For the following reasons, the defendant's motion is GRANTED.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs have filed this civil action arising out of an incident which occurred on April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases