1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 813 F.Supp.
  5. 813 F.Supp. 874 (1993)
 

E.E.O.C. v. C & P TELEPHONE CO.

Civ. A. No. 93-158 SSH.

813 F.Supp. 874 (1993)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant, v. C & P TELEPHONE COMPANY, C & P Telephone Company of Maryland, C & P Telephone Company of Virginia, C & P Telephone Company of West Virginia, and Bell Atlantic Network Services, Respondents.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 3, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tracy Hudson Spicer, EEOC, Baltimore Dist. Office, Baltimore, MD, for applicant.

Cecelia Travers Roudiez, Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc., Washington, DC, for respondents.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is the application of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause why an administrative subpoena, issued by the EEOC on June 8, 1992, should not be enforced. The Court conditionally grants in part and denies in part the EEOC's application.

Background

On October 4, 1991...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases