1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 838 F.Supp.
  5. 838 F.Supp. 848 (1993)
 

DAVID TUNICK, INC. v. KORNFELD

No. 91 Civ. 7027 (DNE).

838 F.Supp. 848 (1993)

DAVID TUNICK, INC., Plaintiff, v. E.W. KORNFELD and Galerie Kornfeld Und Cie, Defendants, v. David TUNICK, Counterclaim Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter, Conston, Alexander & Green, P.C., New York City (William M. Barron, Kieran P. Broderick, of counsel), for plaintiff and counterclaim defendant.

Shearman & Sterling, New York City (Jeremy G. Epstein, Jerome S. Fortinsky, Karen S. Hart, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This action arises from Mr. E. W. Kornfeld's and Galerie Kornfeld und Cie's (collectively "Kornfeld" or "defendants") sale of a signed Picasso print to plaintiff, David Tunick, Inc. Plaintiff alleges that defendants sold David Tunick, Inc. a print entitled Le Minotauromachie (the "Print") which defendants represented was signed by Pablo Picasso (the "Signature") but which, in fact, bears a forged signature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases