1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 869 F.Supp.
  5. 869 F.Supp. 808 (1993)
 

NIKE, INC. v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC.

Civ. No. 93-125-MA.

869 F.Supp. 808 (1993)

NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC., a Delaware corporation, Brooks Shoe Inc., and Brooks Sports, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

October 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Marmaduke, Peter Koehler, Jr., Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland, OR, David Anderson, James Sobieraj, Timothy Q. Delaney, Earl M. Douglas, Willian Brinks Olds Hofer Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

Jonathan Hoffman, Laura Van Harlingen Potter, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet & Hoffman, Portland, OR, Ernie Brooks, John Nemazi, Paul Schwartz, Brooks & Kushman, P.C., Southfield, MI, for defendants.

OPINION

MARSH, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action against defendants for patent infringement. Plaintiff contends that defendants have manufactured and sold athletic shoes which embody their '304 patent "FOOTWEAR WITH ADJUSTABLE VISCOELASTIC UNIT."1 Defendants manufactured the accused shoes under Patent No. 4,934,072 (hereinafter "'072") issued to Ray Frederickson on June...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases