1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 133 N.J.
  5. 133 N.J. 33 (1993)
 

STRUMPH v. SCHERING CORP.

133 N.J. 33 (1993)

626 A.2d 1090

NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 13, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell L. Hewit argued the cause for appellant (Dughi and Hewit, attorneys; Mr. Hewit, Christopher J. Christie, and Mary Elizabeth Gazi, on the briefs).

Earl G. Kauffman, a member of the Pennsylvania bar, argued the cause for respondent (Jack E. Milkis, attorney; Mr. Kauffman and Mr. Milkis, on the brief).

John B. Kearney submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (Kenney & Kearney, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman's dissenting opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 256 N.J.Super. 309, 323, 606 A.2d 1140 (1992).

O'HERN, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons stated by the majority of the Appellate Division, 256 N.J.Super...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases