1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 815 F.Supp.
  5. 815 F.Supp. 793 (1993)
 

ROHM AND HAAS CO. v. BROTECH CORP.

Civ. A. No. 90-109-RRM.

815 F.Supp. 793 (1993)

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROTECH CORPORATION, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolf E. Hutz, N. Richard Powers, and Jeffrey B. Bove, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, and William E. Lambert, III, Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Robert K. Payson, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, Raphael V. Lupo, Jack Q. Lever, Jr., Donna M. Tanguay, and Robert W. Zelnick, Willian Brinks Olds Hofer Gilson & Lione, Washington, DC, Herbert B. Keil, Keil & Weinkauf, Washington, DC, and Paul R. Rosen, and Niels Korup, Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

In this patent infringement case, the plaintiff, Rohm and Haas Company, has identified over 1,100 documents it has withheld from production on the ground that they are protected from disclosure by the attorney client privilege or as work product. See Docket Item 259 at A-1 ("D.I. ___"). The defendant, Brotech Corporation, moved for an in camera inspection of these documents and, in August of 1992, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases